Sunday, December 1, 2019

Review: 'Rules for Living' by Sam Holcroft

Also published in London Theatre Reviews, December 1st 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=2047

Holcroft's dysfunctional family. Credit: David Sprecher.

Christmas comes (slightly) early to the Tower Theatre in Stoke Newington with director John Chapman’s production of Rules for Living. Playwright Sam Holcroft’s seasonal self-help satire mercilessly lets rip at the English middle-classes’ repressed, bitter pretensions of properness as one particularly dysfunctional family’s strict set of – well – Rules for Living fall to pieces with stress over the course of a chaotic Christmas Day.

Perhaps one of the biggest highlights from the off is Set Designer Rob Hebblethwaite’s spectacular work on the space. Together with what must have been a militarily organised platoon of get-in assistants, he has crafted what is surely one of the most beautifully elaborate and alive sets you’ll ever see in any London fringe production. Complete with all the proper household necessaries and neatly divided into fully-functional separate domestic areas, it’s a picture-perfect recreation of a cosy, Christmassy, middle-class family home in London which is sure to immediately draw in a captivated audience and fill them with the spirit of the season. Also present is the crucial video screen display for the essential “Rules” each family member must abide by to function in the Christmas chaos; naturally, much dramatic irony ensues, making for some very amusing comedy. All in all, a marvellous technical accomplishment to be sure, although one that might have benefitted from slightly larger font size on the screen for the benefit of those audience members less able to read well from a distance.

Meanwhile, Chapman confidently directs a fast-paced, compelling work full of fine performances from a close-knit ensemble. Every recognisable strain of family get-together horror is present and accounted for, from lead Adam Hampton-Matthews’ pitifully insecure, dorky loser Matthew, lying to himself and everyone around him in a horrid, nasally voice, to Rosanna Preston’s expertly realised matriarch Edith, full of seething passive-aggression and resentment towards her family straining beneath her outward middle-class manners. Matthew has also brought along his new, failing actress girlfriend - Kasia Chodurek’s Carrie – who provides more than one convenient distraction, whilst swiftly proving herself the sort that everyone is glad of at the family Christmas party; an insufferable bore, utterly convinced of her own delightful ‘quirky randomness’, but who is actually a thoroughly irritating, slightly scary weirdo sorely lacking in proper social sensibilities.

Meanwhile, Dickon Falmer’s embittered, sneering Adam compellingly struggles to keep his thread-bare marriage from breaking, together with Hattie Hahn’s put-upon Sheena endlessly trying to force things to work between them, and Helena Braithwaite proves herself a one-scene wonder as their daughter Emma. Amongst the best performances of the night is Tom Tillery’s elderly invalid Francis, the far-fallen patriarch that still has yet to stoop to his truly repulsive lowest. His is a wonderfully skilful, almost wholly physical performance that relies on Tillery’s veteran command of movement and body work, one so good, in fact, that should Tillery chose to bid goodbye to his time in the theatre after this, it would be a fine farewell indeed.

Amongst all these excellent performances, the ingredients are there for a time-bomb to trigger over turkey, and the audience is left only to wait. Fortunately or not, Chapman’s direction moves things along at an extremely fast pace – perhaps too fast at times, as the cast don’t seem to have a spare moment to slow down and to let their characters breath, or to play the subtleties of lesser moments, particularly early on; but it does happen to give the slower, quieter dramatic moments greater impact when the action slows down enough to accommodate them, and these are excellently realised. Also brilliantly executed are the many scenes of tense, shouty, slanging-match pandemonium, and when things do eventually, inevitably rise to a crescendo of terrifyingly violent domestic chaos, Fight Director Richard Kirby’s work shines before the atmosphere finally cools off into a last, tense tableau of ruin.

Altogether, a brilliantly performed, darkly comic Christmas treat for theatregoers, sure to entertain.

Review: 'A Christmas Carol' at The Bridge House Theatre

Also published in London Theatre Reviews, November 28th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=2040

Rachel Izen leads the talented cast as the first woman to play Scrooge.

Dickens’ classic seasonal morality tale of the bitter miser Scrooge receiving a stern lesson in following Christ’s example all year ‘round comes to the Bridge House Theatre in this lively new stage production.

Theatregoers with a soft-spot for the characterful pub stage will find much to love here. Things start strongly, displaying impressive production values, and making good use of the intimate space throughout the show, with a detailed set, evocative foley artistry, musical accompaniments, and simple special effects doing much to create a suitably festive atmosphere. In a charming twist, the enthusiastic cast often literally regale the audience with telling the story as the action moves between scenes, which, together with a wonderfully energetic party scene – by far the highlight of the show, full of invigorating audience participation – gives everything a wonderfully communal, Christmassy, fireside feeling most apt for Dickens.

The cast share out the work’s many roles between the four of them, with some stand-out performances to be found. Jamie Ross’ Ghost of Christmas Present, with his infectious joviality and distinctive Scottish brogue, is a memorable highlight. Much has also been made of Rachel Izen’s casting as the first female Scrooge. It’s an admirably earnest turn in a work of uneven performances, let down by jarring inconsistency in how the younger Scrooge is cast as male regardless. It feels like a missed opportunity to bolster the female representation in a text nearly devoid of women’s presence originally, further implies that the idea of a woman central to the cast is abnormal as opposed to expected, and passively places Izen – thus isolated by the lack of a fellow female Scrooge The Younger – under unfairly harsh scrutiny for her performance, which seems to suffer for that anxiety.

Indeed, such a casting could have lent the lost love between Scrooge and Belle a modern Sapphic overtone that may have provided an interesting, relevant spin on the insight into the cause of the elder Scrooge’s repressed Victorian misery. It is a shame that this was not so. Granted, Saorla Wright fills a variety of small roles including Belle, but this hardly seems to be of the same consequence.

It all makes for an inconsistent, although heartfelt take on Dickens’ beloved classic. Whilst it may not pass muster as high theatre, there are some genuinely wonderful moments to be found at its strongest points, and as a jovial, energetic pantomime spectacle, its a triumph.

Sunday, November 10, 2019

Review: "1984" by Matthew Dunster

Originally published by London Theatre Reviews, November 10th 2019:
http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1970


The cast of 1984. Credit: Rishi Rai

Seemingly ever-more relevant in our age of ubiquitous tech and social media surveillance, the Questors Theatre celebrates its 90th anniversary with a new production of Matthew Dunster’s stage adaptation of Orwell’s classic tale of Big Brother dystopia.

In a future with a boot stamping on a human face forever, rebel Winston Smith fights back against the system even as he works in a government office responsible for erasing and rewriting the history of the Revolution and The War, with devastating consequences for him and the non-conforming woman he loves.

Director Roger Beaumont’s production is a technically spectacular achievement, with the lavish, beautifully detailed set making ingenious use of multiple video screens, sound systems and film to immerse the audience in an unusually participative, cinematic theatre experience. Lighting and sound renders the unfolding scenes in visually striking, artful ways, and the entire show’s Production Team deserves high praise for pulling off such outstanding, complex technical work which is by far the biggest highlight of the show.

Julian Smith and Clare Purdy as Winston and Julia. Credit: Rishi Rai

Regrettably for this production, however, it seems that perhaps too much effort went into executing the technical side without a hitch, and that the actors’ need for rehearsals went neglected. With few exceptions, the majority of the cast seem to still be in the early phases of book work, doing little more than reciting their lines, albeit with great enthusiasm, but which nevertheless betrays a lack of thorough character work, leaving them feeling as though they are actors playing characters, not yet believably the characters themselves. The effect leaves Winston and Julia in particular feeling robotic, flying in the face of perhaps the entire point of the work, that the pair stand out as recognisably emotive and human against the brain-addled masses they rebel against. Later scenes that should inspire disturbed horror and revulsion are left far less impactful for it.

That less technically lavish productions have previously portrayed more believable versions all of the characters is a shame, and perhaps a warning against hyperfocus on one component over the other in future productions. Suspension of disbelief is often far more contingent on an actors’ ability to sell that belief than any lavish set’s efforts to convince an audience.

Still, there are some memorable performances to be found. David Erdos clearly enjoys chewing the scenery as an unconventionally loud O’Brien, John Turner’s Man in Pub is someone you’d like to share a half with, and the inventive staging of Simon Taylor’s Goldstein in his signature scene will, in the Questors’ particular space, surely give former students flashbacks to their stultifying lectures.

David Erdos' O'Brien with Julian Smith's Winston. Credit: Rishi Rai

Wednesday, November 6, 2019

"Death of a Salesman" by Arthur Miller

Performed at The Piccadilly Theatre, London's West End, November 4th 2019
Also published in London Theatre Reviews, November 6th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1954


Newly transferred from its lauded Spring season run at the Young Vic, directors Marianne Elliot and Miranda Cromwell bring their seminal production of Arthur Miller’s classic Death of a Salesman to the Piccadilly Theatre for Autumn.

Any production of Miller’s tragic, dramatic tale of the downtrodden Willie Loman and his desperate, seemingly hopeless struggles to make a living for his poor family passionately condemns the condescending nonsense of The American Dream, and the cruelty and abuse wrought by the excesses of capitalism on ordinary people – but this extraordinary reinvention confirms the long-held suspicions of many that Willie’s is a uniquely black socio-economic struggle by casting the Lomans as a black family from the South, eking out subsistence in the hurly-burly of 1930s’ New York, in the aftermath of both the Great Depression and the 1920s’ black cultural revolution throughout the American North.

Wendell Pierce and Sharon D. Clarke as the endearing Willie and Lorna Loman. Credit: Brinkhoff/Mögenburg

Elliot and Cromwell’s production is immediately enhanced with thematic urgency and with the depth of black history, one shared with a rich literary tradition of novels and plays, and which now seems so acutely necessary to any true grasp of this play that any other, white, staging of Willie Loman’s struggles comes off as almost wilfully ignorant and sorely lacking by comparison. Every aspect of Arthur Miller’s text is powerfully reinvented and reinvigorated, remade into a stirring clarion call against not only economic injustice, but all forms of racial discrimination under capitalism, and is rendered spectacularly better for it.

Leading a stellar cast with an outstanding performance is Wendell Pierce as Willie Loman. His new incarnation of Miller’s tragic hero masterfully embodies a unique shared history of distinctly black economic and social relations, brilliantly capturing a wonderfully complex interplay of forces bearing down upon him from within and without, his dogged adherence to the romantic notion of the American Dream always battling against a simultaneous harsh reality which he is endlessly driven to deny. Immediately commanding a powerful stage presence, Pierce’s Loman is by turns hugely energetic, funny, deeply complex and conflicted, and full of a palpable grief, frustration and anger ever-simmering beneath his seemingly happy exterior.

Sharon D. Clarke as wife Linda Loman beautifully performs a much-needed voice of calm and reason to Willie’s exhausting, hyperactive ambition, skilfully concealing her own pain and sorrow to play the dutiful, supportive wife – a sorrow which, when it fully emerges in the play’s most affecting scenes, is superbly realised. Together, their warm and loving relationship in their time together on stage, in bad times and good, is a heart-warming joy to behold, and full of great chemistry between the two.

Pierce's Willie Loman with his sons, Sopé Dìrísù’s Biff and Natey Jones' Happy Loman. Credit: Brinkhoff/Mögenburg

The boys of the Loman family are strong in their turns as well, with Sopé Dìrísù’s Biff commanding a great presence and energy of his own alongside Natey Jones’ compelling Happy. In them both, resonant – indeed, renascent - themes of black struggle, and the attendant political contest of the means of liberation, persist. If their father is a Booker T. Washington type, intent on servile negotiation with the system, Happy is W E B Du Bois, determined to brook no restrictions on black freedom or enterprise, with the ambitious, soulful Biff instead a latter-day Marcus Garvey, insistent upon a need to get away from the capitalistic cruelties of city life to seek independent success away from New York’s hotbed of white prejudice, and from a system that demands he succeed only on its own terms. Jones and Dìrísù both perform with a keen awareness of this intertextual historical significance, and infuse their respective characters’ noble ambitions with a resultant richness, urgency, and complexity which it is a pleasure to watch, both actors transitioning skilfully from embodying their father’s fond hopes and dreams for them, to the pains and frustrations of their imperfect real lives.

Through Charlotte Sutton’s superb casting sensibilities, the Loman men’s struggles for success are ingeniously further situated as a struggle – both to beget and to be liberated from – proximity to whiteness. Whether by Willie leveraging the dorky white Bernard’s (a meek, earnest Ian Bonar) greater access to education for his underachieving son Biff, a literalised, torrid affair with whiteness embodied in Victoria Hamilton-Barritt’s seductive Woman, Joseph Mydell’s memorably enigmatic, gregarious Uncle Ben - dressed head-to-toe in conspicuously white finery whilst promising Willie diamonds for ever more toil - or the insensitive evil wrought by Matthew Seadon-Young’s cruel white boss Howard, the supporting cast is full of standout performances, enriching the drama and providing the play’s final revelation – that this essential release from capitalism’s myriad racialized cruelties comes, tragically, to mean very different things for Willie and his family - almost unbearably powerful, shocking dramatic effect.

Particular praise must go to set designer Anna Fleischle, whose singular, beautifully complex work has created something which seems as fluid and alive as any other character on her stage. It glides gracefully from scene to scene without interruption, with Aideen Malone’s dynamic lighting moving and changing just as seamlessly, much of it poignantly evocative of grim cold, and of a desolation both spiritual and material which is implicitly shot through the play’s text, made explicit by this wonderful design. Fleischle’s efforts seek to embody Willie’s erratic, panicked thoughts as he struggles with his patriarchal duty to his family, and his experience in a world which renders him small and insignificant against its own uncaring vastness. Fleischle’s spectacular achievement does just this, whilst also seeming to capture as well the transient, unstable nature of black life itself under such deplorable economic and social conditions. Hers is a truly masterful achievement, deserving of the highest commendation.

Left: Ian Bonar's Bernard with the Loman family. Credit: Brinkhoff/Mögenburg

Further manifesting the compellingly rich world of the play is the superb soundtrack, which pays loving tributes to both the bluesy jazz of the 20s’ Harlem renaissance and to the beautiful, soulful singing of the black gospel tradition, with tense and foreboding original composition underscoring Willie’s tragic tale in-between. Some fine costume work helps last of all, though not least, to put the final touches to a singularly brilliant production, which is never without tight direction from Elliot and Cromwell and consistently high energy from the spectacular cast. Although some transitions, particularly between penultimate scenes, seem somewhat out of step with the fluid grace of others, and energy may perhaps falter in places for having so often been taken to such extremes elsewhere, these are no detriment overall.

This incarnation of Miller’s most famous work is a superlative tour-de-force in every respect, a definitive theatre experience which is more than worthy of the standing ovation it received, and that deserves to be seen again and again.

Anna Fleischle has designed a beautiful set. Credit: Brinkhoff/Mögenburg



Thursday, October 10, 2019

"Follow My Fingers" by Hannah West

Performed at The Bread and Roses Theatre, Clapham, October 9th 2019
Also published in London Theatre Reviews, October 10th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1797


The first stage offering from new theatre and film company Rebel Act Productions, Follow My Fingers presents a strikingly dark, introspective tale of deep trauma and painstaking recovery for one young woman and her group of travelling friends.

Writer, director, producer, set designer, and lead actor Hannah West turns in a fine performance as Heather, skilfully alternating between pre and post-traumatic incarnations, one happy, bubbly, upbeat, and confident, and the other robbed of all enthusiasm for living as the work progresses, with Hannah West’s own minimalist set design fluidly intercutting from Heather’s variety of recollections to her time in therapy.

Many strong performances also litter the ensemble cast West has assembled for the work, nearly all female save one, and remarkable for the refreshing variety and depth of women’s personalities on display. Abigail Davies is a memorably mousy Sally, a pious woman of God, Hanna Durham’s Claire is a wellspring of humour with fine comic timing, Sophie Hill’s Annie provides a loud and boisterous counterweight to Sally, and Jessikah Wilson has an excellent manner with her client as Heather’s therapist, alongside smaller roles.


The work boasts a practically all-female cast of diverse characters

Meanwhile, Jamie Basardi’s solitary male presence displays great range as he convincingly performs a variety of different characters in vital bit-parts. Ably assisted by movement director Marlie Haco, the women in particular are all wonderful actresses, possessing great skill in transporting the audience from the confines of West’s sparse set surroundings into a variety of convincing scenarios and locations without the aid of extravagant sets or props, instead using movement and performance to create a variety of visually striking tableaus.
West’s writing is first-rate, too, with her script mounting in palpable tension and dread before finally exploding into an emotionally harrowing crescendo of traumatic shock and grief which makes a real, visceral impact.

Her script is full of energy, warmth, humanity, and humour, and explores everything from the prior build-up to the traumatic event itself, the aftermath, and the long, slow road to recovery. In all this, she shows great emotional sensitivity and a pleasing depth to her research of a charged and delicate central subject – her title, Follow My Fingers, is itself derived from the trauma therapy technique of replicating the rapid eye movement of dreaming to process shock in Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy.

Indeed, some of the more dramatic moments seemed so authentic and powerful that audience members were moved to tears. Though, perhaps, West’s talent for writing striking moments is a touch too great, as the play could’ve ended at several prior points in the last few minutes with no loss of quality; and, initially, as the play warms up to its impactful moments, the lighter writing seems to be very conventional youth travel story fare – but the larger dramatic moments at which West excels, and her talented cast, help to elevate the work beyond the usual standard, and its sincere, nuanced exploration of trauma by way of a conventional travel story is a refreshing twist which gives these proceedings an impressive narrative depth and broader socio-political importance in our age of sincerity and openness about mental health.

Jamie Basardi with Hannah West and Sophie Hill

Of great help to the depth of immersion in the tale is Zoe Smith’s sound and lighting together with Hannah West’s set design. The performance space makes an immediate impact, with its sparse and minimal white furniture visually striking against a sheer black background, which together with the cast unabashedly using the seating gangway as staging unto itself in a very enclosed space evokes the themes of intimacy and exposure very well. So, too, is there music on offer from the brother-sister duo of Sam and Hannah West, which joins the other elements of sound design in both adding to the initial lightness of tone and furthering a sense of later trauma, as Smith’s sound design gradually melds it into a disjointed cacophony of noise as Heather’s mind itself becomes a more confused and shaken environment.

A very well put-together, dramatic, and emotionally impactful work full of strong writing, wonderful design and great performances. As a very first theatre outing for a newly-formed company, Follow My Fingers is certainly an excellent, impressive initial effort. One looks forward to seeing where Rebel Act Productions, and the multi-talented Hannah West, go from here.

Sunday, August 4, 2019

"Clara" by Elena Mazzon

Performed at Ram Jam Records at The Grey Horse, August 2nd 2019
Also published in London Theatre Reviews, August 4th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1582


The history of classical music – as with many other fields of human endeavour – sadly too often omits the presence of great women from its cultural and historical memory. Fortunately, writer and performer Elena Mazzon together with director Catriona Kerridge issues a bold challenge to this unjust patriarchal dominion with Clara – Sex, Love and Classical Music, a one-women show devoted to vividly bringing Clara Schumann, née Wieck, the brilliant classical composer, pianist, and later wife to the better-known Robert Schumann, back to life in full colour to tell her story to the world.

Mazzon is superb as Clara, single-handedly carrying the entire show and creating a relentlessly energetic presence so vividly realised that one almost feels as though the former Wieck herself has emerged into the present day. Her performance – ably assisted by Peter Wernock’s voice and movement coaching - is a richly coloured tapestry of shared humanity in everything from her fiery, righteously feminist speech to the subtleties of her bold and confident body language. Mazzon’s beautifully written, evocative monologue charts a course through every aspect of Clara’s storied life from her remarkable childhood through to struggling to be an artistically ambitious, unreservedly sexual woman in 1830s Europe, to the tragic end of her marriage to Robert and beyond.

The skilful performance and writing together, broken up by apropos samples of Clara’s work performed live on the piano by Mazzon to lend proceedings a musica a programma significance thanks to musical director Stefania Passamonte, broadens and deepens our perception of Clara’s lived history, and gradually reveals more and more of a story of human triumph which is by turns dramatic, funny, heart-warming, and tragic in all the ways a life is. As a one-hander performance, Mazzon’s work is a joy to behold; as a first-time debut writer, she proves herself hugely talented and accomplished.

The candlelit interior of Ram Jam Records’ piano bar also proves a beautiful, intimate surrounding, keeping us in close proximity to Clara’s presence throughout, and maintaining the all-too appropriate sense amongst the audience of attending a concert or recital, which, in this instance, with the candlelight seemingly our only light source, creates a thrillingly mystic feeling of séance and resurrection to bolster the sense of the spirit of Clara being brought back to life.

Superbly realised, evocatively written, and beautifully performed drama altogether. A triumph.

Review: "Nostalgia" by Clive Moffatt

Performed at The White Bear Theatre, July 31st 2019
Also published by London Theatre Reviews, August 2nd 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1578


A new lyrical revue from Nomadic Theatrical Productions’ writer-director Clive Moffatt, “Nostalgia” is a narrative tour of various pasts told through the different recollections of a vibrant ensemble cast of characters, exploring the meaning, importance, and relevance of our memories of years gone by, especially in older age, and in the remembrances of young adults recalling their halcyon schooldays.

Clive Elliot, central to the cast as a flamboyant narrator, proves a highlight as a great storyteller, by turns funny, compelling, warm, and sincere with a strong, visually distinct stage presence. Liam Weller provides a nice contrast as a younger, knock-kneed schoolboy, bringing a charm and innocence to his rose-tinted recollections of school, and Jayne Beaumont as The Woman gives one of the most powerful and emotive performances, recalling a deeply troubled and traumatic past. Nick Rutherford and Ian Recordon meanwhile bring their own presence and emotive command of the text to the work nicely.

The writing itself, whilst having isolated moments of genuine, evocative affect and good craft, can sometimes feel disjointed, as though the series of monologues which bind the work together do not form a single coherent narrative so much as a series of writing exercises on a theme. Clive Moffatt’s light-touch direction together with Gwenan Bain and Chuma Emembolu’s lighting and sound, though, help to bring things together into a coherent whole, with Emembolu’s sound direction in particular making good use of some musical staples of classical and big band fare to evoke the titular nostalgia for a different era.

More an avant-garde exercise on a theme than anything particularly ground-breaking, certainly, but enjoyable performances and affecting writing help to bring everything together into a consistently interesting, reflective evening of theatre.

Clive Elliot with Ian Recordon as the Narrator and Older Man. Credit: Matthew Partridge

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Review: Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of The People by Jolley Goswald

Originally published in London Theatre Reviews, July 10th 2019 (http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1479)
Performed at the Playground Theatre.

Fringe company Here Now Ensemble, and their director Jolley Goswald, have certainly not shied away from the renewed social and political relevance of Henrik Ibsen’s original play. The dramatic tale of a principled, educated whistle-blower’s life being ruined by a corrupt, self-serving establishment that would rather profit from wilful ignorance of an imminent danger to the local community does indeed seem grimly topical in our modern, post-Brexit ,‘sick of experts’ political landscape, and the company’s very deliberate decision to perform in a venue literally down the road from Grenfell Tower places the writing within a chilling, morbidly timely new context.

It may have been enough, under these dire meta-fictional circumstances, simply to stage the original work and leave the audience to infer the modern meanings for themselves; but theatregoers expecting to arrive to a straightforward adaptation of Ibsen should leave their expectations in the foyer and prepare for an almost entirely new version of the play, one rewritten from the ground up to embrace modernity, and unafraid to explicitly name the problems of Brexit, austerity, capitalism and anti-feminism. Together with the production’s distinctly Brechtian fourth-wall-breaking sensibilities – its cast of characters named for their real-life actors, and lead Hannah van der Westhuysen explicitly halting the action to address the audience as participants, and state aims of using theatre as a forum for political engagement and calls to positive action - little remains here for fans of Ibsen but the bare-bones of his faithfully recreated plot, construed in an almost improvised, vulgar stream-of-consciousness by a talented and capable cast of performers with a strong stage presence. Purists may balk to find everything so changed, but it is a bold, fascinating approach to the text nonetheless.

Credit: Jolley Goswald

Goswald’s direction is full of laudable confidence in his vision and together with his actors he manages to never lose a refreshingly naturalistic, fast-paced feel and an engaging atmosphere which is always a pleasure, although it is not an approach that always works textually. At times, dialogue can feel a little too improvised, as though cast members are stumbling for where to go next, and perhaps, like Ibsen’s Thomas Stockmann, the writing’s great flaw is that it can sometimes be too upfront in its desire to tell its truths. One scene in particular, although very well performed by an energetic and impassioned Gabriel Akuwudike, veers perilously close to ludicrous soap opera melodrama that it can be difficult to take seriously, depending on one’s sensibilities. That said, at other times, when it works, there are genuinely great, pacey moments of compelling and affecting human drama that are well worth admission. It makes for something of a mixed bag, but one in which everybody is likely to find things they enjoy.

Meanwhile, Alys Whitehead’s compactly detailed set design visually helps along the writing’s ingenious transfer to distinctly modern, socialist millennial flat-share environs, Holly Ellis’ lighting lends dramatic thrust to all the right moments, and collaborating sibling Will Goswold’s sound design provides the enjoyable, youthful soundtrack. Doubtless many might find it an acquired taste, but it remains a brave, praiseworthy effort to revitalise the original text, full of talent, provocative originality, and life.

Friday, July 5, 2019

Review: Spitfire Sisters by Three of a Kind

(Originally published in London Theatre Reviews, July 5th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1455)

Performed at The Space Theatre, July 3rd 2019

In 1973, the poet Harold Bloom famously wrote about what he called The Anxiety of Influence. The backbone of his theory of poetry, he thought that most new writers, inspired by reading about the greats that had come before, would feel too much pressure to measure up to them and to win their imagined approval. So they would buckle under the strain and end up producing derivative, ephemeral fare, of which the people they idolise would surely not approve.

Spitfire Sisters, the second offering from the writing team of Doc Andersen-Bloomfield, Catherine Comfort and Heather Dunmore, together known as Three of a Kind, is an ambitious work of new writing. Unfortunately, this fictionalised docudrama chronicling the history of the women serving in the Air Transport Auxiliary during World War II is let down by a host of peculiar, questionable creative decisions which keep the production – the earnest and laudable effort of giving women’s underappreciated history a sizeable platform and attempting to create something of which their forebears could be proud notwithstanding – from being all that it could be.
Things get off to a promising start with Sound Designer Kerri Chesser’s selection of classic Glenn Miller Big Band fare helpfully evoking the wartime spirit of the 40s, and the sparse set design suggesting the interior of the famous White Waltham Airbase, from which the women were deployed to deliver planes to the frontlines; but between lacklustre writing which the committed actors struggle to work with, Adam Hemming’s poltroonish direction and short-sighted staging, and Andy Straw’s confusing and irritating lighting design, things swiftly deteriorate into an unfocused, plodding bore which it is difficult to like, no matter how much one might want to.


Faye Maughan does her duty as Phyllis Griggs. Photography by Liz Isles

Above all, the distinctly one-dimensional writing, itself likely derivative of Giles Whittell’s non-fiction book Spitfire Women of World War II, pervades and tarnishes every other aspect of the production. The play’s cast of characters, all of which feel woefully underdeveloped and poorly written, especially in their oftentimes overformal and unrealistic dialogue, seem to be drawn from two historical figures each, leaving them feeling indistinct, and like poor substitutes for far more interesting individual historical figures. Faye Maughan’s Phyllis Griggs is clearly set in the mould of women like Rosemary Rees – whose husband urged her to purchase a personal Miles Hawk Major plane to improve her social life - and Pauline Gower – daughter of a high-up Tory MP, who fought for the right to wear trousers. Alessandra Perotto is the bold and brave Typhoon-flying, twice-Severn-Bridge-ducking Ann Wood and the spirited Jackie Cochran – who steadfastly refused to ever allow the British to “put her in her place” - at once, which unfortunately seems to cause her affected Appalachian American accent to constantly slip. Meanwhile, Mary Roubous endearingly combines the physically sickly intellect of Mary de Bunsen with the animal-loving introversion of the Argentine Picture Post pin-up Maureen Dunlop.

Unfortunately, this style of merging two distinct people and personalities together to create a single fictional analogue at best leaves the new characters feeling indistinct and underwritten, and at worst carries a meta-fictional suggestion that these women’s real lives and histories can be freely swapped around, tinkered with, and whittled down to useful storytelling props in the pursuit of crafting tiresomely didactic theatre. Their composite lives are unexamined and never fully realised, with the writing disinterested in saying anything more substantial about the significance of 40s-era women’s nobility, bravery, courage and sacrifice in wartime service to their country besides sternly finger-wagging at only the most glaringly obvious, almost cartoonish misogyny, and the self-evident economic injustice of a workplace earnings gap, lazily garnished with only the most superficial references to the real, unexamined history.

Indeed, for all the work’s promotional bluster about feminism, the writing is full of bizarre and ill-considered contradictions. In the course of the story – seemingly little more than a rudderless lecture on How Sexism Is Bad, which lacks any distinguishable narrative beginning, middle, or end - one so-called sister hands in her resignation early so she can run off to marry a rich man – naturally the most important priority in a woman’s life, never mind standing up to Hitler and the Nazis for her country. It is difficult to imagine that the late, great A.T.A pilot Joan Hughes, of the four-engine flight clearance elite, whom never married lest a man come between her and her love of flying, would approve of such antics.


The Spitfire Sisters face down an air raid in a dramatic moment. Photography by Liz Isles

Later on, a horrifically burned man (Steven Shawcroft’s RAF Airman Nigel in a totally unconvincing, obviously rubber face prosthesis) makes grossly inappropriate pleas to another woman not to risk flying because she’s too beautiful, lest a similar accident tarnish her pin-up model good looks (surely the only thing of value that she can contribute to the war effort) and then has his backwards attitude and thoroughly weird, stalky, out-of-nowhere infatuation – frightfully uncharacteristic of real A.T.A men that simply treated the women as respected colleagues - helpfully validated when she predictably dies in a crash. This despite many real female A.T.A pilots, like Amy Johnson, Audrey Sale-Barker and Joan Page, historically surviving numerous plane crashes and assorted in-flight emergencies, badly injured though they may have been. This way, he gets to feel justified in blaming the other women for her death, and claiming that it proves they don’t deserve to be paid properly for their work. Of course.

“Well, there we are, then.” one feels lead to think, “That’ll teach those uppity women not to do as they’re told by men who know better.” It’s all really rather troubling. This cast of characters seem at times to be a tragic far cry from their real-life inspirations; unlike Joan Hughes, who refused to marry and put paid to sceptical Air Force men, Jackie Sarsour who proclaimed flying “the most natural thing in the world…as though my entire life had led to this moment”, Mary de Bunsen taking to the skies explicitly to escape “the ghastly fate of the daughter-in-waiting”, Jackie Cochran’s life’s ambition to be known as “the greatest woman pilot in history”, Margaret Duhalde and Ann Wood both fearlessly giving male officers a piece of their mind, or Maureen Dunlop’s simple preference for animals over people, the fictionalised women’s excitement seems to peak most of all at the thought of getting to throw parties, wear pretty dresses, and talk about boys. It hardly seems fitting of the real legacy which supposedly inspired them to life.

Yet, instead of the rich storytelling potential of all of this history and legacy, we are left with the shallow, proscriptive writing pressing on the point of contemporary earnings gap concerns, with the stories of our war heroes seemingly being used as little more than an alluring backdrop to hang a portrait of misogyny which manifests in ways so unsophisticated and glaringly obvious that it feels risibly condescending, so much so that it does the far more subtle realities of misogyny itself a disservice in representation. Of course misogyny is real, and doubtless woven deeply into the fabric of our society and culture, sometimes into the very structure and form of language itself – far more deeply, surely, that a few tired, predictable, off-colour remarks of ‘but you’re only a woman!’ in so many drab variations. That much is – or certainly ought to be - obvious to anybody paying a modicum of attention. Indeed, in Russia, until World War II, one literally could not use terms like ‘infantry’ or ‘machine gunner’ or ‘tank driver’ without explicitly referring to a man. New words had to be invented from scratch just to create space for women in the army, because the very concept was unfathomable. Such is the deplorable breadth and depth of women’s oppression, whether in America, Britain, Russia, or anywhere else in the world we live in, be it in the 1940s, or the modern day.

That being said, the first rule of good writing is to avoid telling the audience things they already know.


Saluting noble efforts. Photography by Liz Isles

Matters are not helped by such a culturally, historically, and artistically informed work – uniquely by women, about women’s experience, and singularly for women - being left in the hands of a male director, which feels quite simply inappropriate in a great many respects. In practice, Hemming is forced into a grim Scylla and Charybdis scenario of either appearing to appropriate the work of women writers and to be bossing around a majority-female cast as he pleases, or else, all-too aware of these dreadful optics, being so overcautious and hands-off that he may as well have given up the task altogether. Either way, he is left doomed to such innate incompetence with the material that it really seems that the writing team has been recklessly inconsiderate in ever giving it to him in the first place. One can’t help but feel, with the production otherwise so intent on touting the importance of feminism and women’s representation, that a female director would surely have been more apt, and certainly far more competent at the task.

Hemming, though, seemingly opts for the latter directing style, and consequently, the play is left feeling too loose, disjointed, and lacking in firm directorial vision to make any positive impression. His cast struggle with a lack of direction or input on their characters, seeming only to read their lines as fast as possible, moments of drama fail to make any impact, and staging decisions are sometimes ridiculously impractical. More than once, actors are positioned so far to stage right that those sitting on the right-hand side in the back literally cannot see them. Meanwhile, Andy Straw’s irritatingly confusing lighting too often aims for ‘atmospheric low light’ and lands in ‘too dim to see anything from the back of the room’. Straw and Hemming are also far too fond of total blackouts, rankly abusing them for simple scene transitions to the point of the audience beginning to clap despite the play being far from over. It was of no help to the disjointed feel of the writing and the unconfident direction.

An earnest and experienced cast do their best despite it all, to be sure. Annabel Smith and Chloe Wade in particular do an admirable job of delivering characterful monologues which constitute some of the strongest writing in the otherwise weak text. Alas, to paraphrase Hitchcock: “To make a great play, you need three things – the script, the script, and the script.”


Chloe Wade and Mary Roubos as Jessie Harris and Georgia Smythe-West. Photography by Liz Isles

Spitfire Sisters is a disappointing, forgettable failure in nearly every aspect, crippled by the Anxiety of Influence – but Three of a Kind should not give up their worthy ambitions. Instead, they should and must try again. They must keep writing, keep improving, and keep on championing the cause of recording women’s erased history, and not only for themselves. At present, it is grimly true that women, especially those in the public eye – be they actors or writers – are not allowed to fail. Such is the ruthless, cruel, impossible perfection endlessly demanded of them. That this production has failed, given the weight of its own ambition and the daunting shadow of the legacy it exists in, is unsurprising and no-one should be too harshly blamed. Anyone would struggle in those circumstances.

More importantly, this failure is no bad thing. Women, like all people, must be allowed to fail and be given new chances to succeed, just the same as men. Only then we will have any sort of real equality.


Fly by night. Photography by Liz Isles.

Saturday, June 29, 2019

(Slightly) Long(er) Read: On "Fix Up" by Kwame Kwei-Armah

(A rather more...bloggy first draft of a review published in London Theatre Reviews, June 28th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1439)

Performed at the Tower Theatre, June 27th 2019

Disclosure: I have been involved with the Tower Theatre since 2016 and am personally acquainted with some of the crew.

First performed in 2004 at the National Theatre in London, Kwame Kwei-Armah’s powerful drama of black identity, forgotten history, and divided loyalties has had a homecoming of sorts in being newly staged by the Tower Theatre in Stoke Newington. Reborn within Hackney borough, the beating heart of one of London’s most thriving minority communities, proceedings are immediately given a striking metafictional edge. Reborn within Hackney borough, the beating heart of one of London’s most thriving minority communities, proceedings are immediately given a striking metafictional edge, only strengthened by the significance of a restaging of such an unapologetically black play in 2019, in the throes of a new wave of sustained civil rights activism throughout the African diaspora. There is, after all, really no such thing as apolitical art.

Fix Up sees its protagonist Brother Kiyi (Richard Bobb-Semple, making his Tower Theatre debut) struggling to keep his titular bookshop, devoted to all manner of black biographical history, from closing down for want of customers. Even whilst his adopted son of sorts, the endearingly hapless Carl (Isiah Bobb-Semple), brings in boxes of new books, it seems that their community is more interested in chasing popular trends and fitting into a predominantly white society than in really connecting with their own uniquely black history and culture. Then, one day, Jasmine Rachelle’s Alice, a young mixed-race woman caught in the midst of both worlds and struggling to find her own meaningful identity, visits the shop, forcing a devastating reckoning with a dark and troubled past as personal as it is political.


Richard Bobb-Semple as Brother Kiyi. Credit: David Sprecher

Kwei-Armah’s writing has a wonderful strength and dramatic power, his dialogue crackling with the energy and eloquence of lyrical, rapid-fire patois, and given a sharp edge by (viewer be warned) unabashed deployment of the most explicit reclaimed racial term. His writing is brought to life by a hugely talented cast of actors, chief among them Rachelle and the elder Bobb-Semple. Both give moving, powerhouse performances, showing huge range and ability, and doing much to sell the play’s moments of genuinely emotionally devastating impact.

Isiah Bobb-Semple is a pleasure as the complicated Carl, the young man on a journey to articulate and come to terms with personal and political history, with Isiah moving deftly from the vivacious, youthful energy of his affected happy-go-lucky demeanour to the much more sombre notes of a grim past Carl still struggles with, and making it all believable as he goes. Meanwhile, Valerie Paul’s seemingly larger-than-life, no-nonsense Norma has an infectious energy and boldness about her, deftly commanding every scene she’s in, and Kieron Mieres skilfully rounds off the cast with an enjoyable, confident take on the hypocritical Kwesi, the shop’s wannabe Malcolm X in-residence, suspiciously more interested in capitalism than radicalism. All the cast pull off the work’s variety of complex, deeply flawed characters with aplomb and, in all the best moments of powerful human drama and tragedy, are wonderful to watch.

Supporting the cast is the stand-out work of the creative team, chief amongst them Holly Spice, whose ingenious set design frames the dilapidated Fix Up bookshop as a microcosmic distillation of the running theme of the foundation of black historical knowledge itself withering away and languishing in distinctly outmoded ‘uncool’ surroundings, whilst the faces of great black thinkers look on from their portraits in the background, their legacies of thought and action haunting the present of black life.


The spectre of black history haunts the present. Credit: David Sprecher

Phillip Ley’s sound design together with Sarah Assaf’s musical arrangement compliments this visual storytelling wonderfully, with a soundscape evocative of neglected black history that centres Marcus Garvey’s surviving words of righteous anger and indignation as they repeatedly puncture through the listless mundanity of the day-to-day, demanding an audience that will listen and take notice. Nick Insley’s lighting lends a beautifully solemn, portrait-like pathos to some moving, emotive monologues from the leads and heightens all the most shocking moments. Kwei-Armah’s lyrical patois, meanwhile, is brought out nicely by dialect coach Peta Barker.

Although events do build to a compelling, energetic and emotionally devastating finale in the second half, this leaves the first half, by comparison, seeming slowed down and slightly lacking in the same energy and momentum, with some of the longer pauses unfortunately suggesting delayed cues rather than dramatic effect, though this can easily be remedied in the coming performances. Nevertheless, director Landé Belo, in her Tower Theatre directorial debut, has accomplished quite a feat of storytelling, bringing a clear and confident vision to the text and creating work which is a richly thought-provoking and powerful pleasure to watch.


Isiah Bobb-Semple as Carl and Valerie Paul as Nora. Credit: David Sprecher

A final thought: doubtless, in our modern age, it seems that there will be some who are compelled to cynically label the work as a “black play”, and to superficially declare it as being about “black issues”, as though “blackness” is something to be relegated, resented and shunned, much like “women’s issues” is so often nastily deployed; but this amateurish view by a (likely) white commentariat contingent should be warned that they devalue work like Fix Up at everybody’s peril, including their own.

Of course, a term like “black issues” invites a problematic, reductive aspect; it is manifestly absurd to suggest a single, universal “black experience” or any one set of “black issues” (certainly, the play’s collection of characters are not an abstract monolith of rhetorical blackness, but complex, flawed human beings in conflict with one another) and there is a universality to the plea to remember and respect shared history and to find belonging and acceptance that will resonate with every viewer, irrespective of race - but this should surely not require downplaying or dismissing the blackness of the messengers, or the significance of their uniquely black experiences in shaping the message they deliver to us all: that our shared history is important, and worthy of attention, preservation and celebration of its moments of triumph. To merely dismiss it as a “black play” and its themes as “black issues” whilst our libraries and high street book shops close down by the day under austerity, and our centres of cultural and social history and knowledge vanish from our lives whilst we look away, distracted by trends on our social media feeds, is insanity.

Nevertheless, Belo’s work is a timely, accomplished reminder that perhaps, whether black or white, we should all put our phones away and make the time to stop by our local Fix Up.


Isiah Bobb-Temple as Carl and Jasmine Rachelle as Alice. Credit: David Sprecher

Review: Fix Up by Kwame Kwei-Armah

(Originally published in London Theatre Reviews, June 28th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1439)

Performed at the Tower Theatre, June 27th 2019

Disclosure: I have been involved with the Tower Theatre since 2016 and am personally acquainted with some of the crew.

First performed in 2004 at the National Theatre in London, Kwame Kwei-Armah’s powerful drama of black identity, forgotten history, and divided loyalties has had a homecoming of sorts in being newly staged by the Tower Theatre in Stoke Newington. Reborn within Hackney borough, the beating heart of one of London’s most thriving minority communities, proceedings are immediately given a striking metafictional edge.

Fix Up sees its protagonist Brother Kiyi (Richard Bobb-Semple, making his Tower Theatre debut) struggling to keep his titular bookshop, devoted to all manner of black biographical history, from closing down for want of customers. Even whilst his adopted son of sorts, the endearingly hapless Carl (Isiah Bobb-Semple), brings in boxes of new books, it seems that their community is more interested in chasing popular trends and fitting into a predominantly white society than in really connecting with their own uniquely black history and culture. Then, one day, Jasmine Rachelle’s Alice, a young mixed-race woman caught in the midst of both worlds and struggling to find her own meaningful identity, visits the shop, forcing a devastating reckoning with a dark and troubled past as personal as it is political.


Richard Bobb-Semple as Brother Kiyi. Credit: David Sprecher

Kwei-Armah’s writing has a wonderful strength and dramatic power, his dialogue crackling with the energy and eloquence of lyrical, rapid-fire patois, and given a sharp edge by (viewer be warned) unabashed deployment of the most explicit reclaimed racial term. His writing is brought to life by a hugely talented cast of actors, chief among them Rachelle and the elder Bobb-Semple. Both give moving, powerhouse performances, showing huge range and ability, and doing much to sell the play’s moments of genuinely emotionally devastating impact.

Isiah Bobb-Semple is a pleasure as the complicated Carl, the young man on a journey to articulate and come to terms with personal and political history, with Isiah moving deftly from the vivacious, youthful energy of his affected happy-go-lucky demeanour to the much more sombre notes of a grim past Carl still struggles with, and making it all believable as he goes. Meanwhile, Valerie Paul’s seemingly larger-than-life, no-nonsense Norma has an infectious energy and boldness about her, deftly commanding every scene she’s in, and Kieron Mieres skilfully rounds off the cast with an enjoyable, confident take on the hypocritical Kwesi, the shop’s wannabe Malcolm X in-residence, suspiciously more interested in capitalism than radicalism. All the cast pull off the work’s variety of complex, deeply flawed characters with aplomb and, in all the best moments of powerful human drama and tragedy, are wonderful to watch.

Supporting the cast is the stand-out work of the creative team, chief amongst them Holly Spice, whose ingenious set design frames the dilapidated Fix Up bookshop as a microcosmic distillation of the running theme of the foundation of black historical knowledge itself withering away and languishing in distinctly outmoded ‘uncool’ surroundings, whilst the faces of great black thinkers look on from their portraits in the background, their legacies of thought and action haunting the present of black life.


The spectre of black history haunts the present. Credit: David Sprecher

Phillip Ley’s sound design together with Sarah Assaf’s musical arrangement compliments this visual storytelling wonderfully, with a soundscape evocative of neglected black history that centres Marcus Garvey’s surviving words of righteous anger and indignation as they repeatedly puncture through the listless mundanity of the day-to-day, demanding an audience that will listen and take notice. Nick Insley’s lighting lends a beautifully solemn, portrait-like pathos to some moving, emotive monologues from the leads and heightens all the most shocking moments. Kwei-Armah’s lyrical patois, meanwhile, is brought out nicely by dialect coach Peta Barker.

Although events do build to a compelling, energetic and emotionally devastating finale in the second half, this leaves the first half, by comparison, seeming slowed down and slightly lacking in the same energy and momentum, with some of the longer pauses unfortunately suggesting delayed cues rather than dramatic effect, though this can easily be remedied in the coming performances. Nevertheless, director Landé Belo, in her Tower Theatre directorial debut, has accomplished quite a feat of storytelling, bringing a clear and confident vision to the text and creating work which is a richly thought-provoking and powerful pleasure to watch.


Isiah Bobb-Semple as Carl and Valerie Paul as Nora. Credit: David Sprecher

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Review: The Merry Wives of Windsor by William Shakespeare

(Originally published in London Theatre Reviews, May 24th 2019: http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1287)

Performed at the Tower Theatre, May 23rd 2019

Disclosure: I have been involved with the Tower Theatre since 2016 and am personally acquainted with some of the cast and crew.

The latest in the Tower Theatre’s long tradition of touring Shakespeare productions to London and Paris for the summer, this time it falls to director Rob Ellis and his assistant Ciara Robley to deliver a new incarnation of Shakespeare’s comedy of righteous double-crossing and spirited, wifely rage.

With many of its central characters returning from Henry IV Part I and Henry IV Part 2, Wives’ comedy is oddly situated in Shakespeare’s body of work as a sort of side-story spin-off in which the grasping (in more ways than one, rather) buffoon Sir John Falstaff, enamoured with the sizeable dowries of the Windsor town wives, concocts a daft scheme to woo their assets out from under them. Naturally, the canny wives are having none of it, and so all the women of Windsor band together to show the dastardly old pervert what for.

Sangita Modgil and John Chapman as Master Ford and Sir Falstaff. Credit: Robert Piwko

The cast and crew make the best of what is often Shakespeare’s least well-regarded writing, wisely excising much of the dull, superfluous detail from the original script to make for a much pithier, faster-paced and more compelling production. Meanwhile, Max Batty and Lynda Twidale’s respective set and costume design transport proceedings to a lavishly-realised 1950s white picket fence incarnation of Windsor which is a gorgeously detailed pleasure to behold, and Colin Guthrie’s together with Ellis’ musical selections, full of contemporary rocking surf guitar numbers, lends everything a delightfully jaunty, carefree summertime atmosphere.

Playgoers in search of the thematic depth of Hamlet or vivid characterisations of The Scottish Play may be sorely disappointed by Wives, and perhaps find its comedic premise and characters far more simplistic and one-dimensional than the Bard’s more well-known fare, but Ellis’ cast does their level best with the material regardless. Amongst the highlights is John Chapman in a spirited starring role as a repulsive, lecherous – indeed, some may say grimly modern – Falstaff who is hugely entertaining to watch. Meanwhile, the Mistresses Ford and Page (Jill Davy and Helen McCormack) are both wonderfully energetic and compelling, with great camaraderie and chemistry between them, joined by Madeleine Gordon in an entertaining turn as the delightfully cunning Mistress Quickly. Sangita Modgil’s gender-bent Master Ford performs with great enthusiasm and vitality, carrying off her deliveries with a lively aplomb bordering on Time Lord, whilst James Van Langenberg makes for both an infectiously upbeat Nym and an endearingly sympathetic Master Fenton. There are surely some who will come for the Bard and stay for Daniel Watson’s gregarious, strongly-accented Sir Hugh Evans.

All the cast give earnest, committed performances, and all are ably assisted by Chris Mason and Anna Kovacs’ respective lighting and sound design, which creates compellingly atmospheric, absorbing, and evocative imagery to compliment what are at times vastly detailed, beautifully staged scenes of comic farce. That this is perhaps not Shakespeare’s best work is sometimes reflected in fluctuations in the energy of the production, but it remains a boldly upbeat, creative, and gorgeously put together evening of theatre, full of talent, and which never fails to entertain.

Garden party. Credit: Robert Piwko

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Review: Boomerang by Ivana Mazza-Coates and Madeleine Shenai

Originally published in London Theatre Reviews, May 17th 2019 (http://www.londontheatrereviews.co.uk/post.cfm?p=1277)

Performed at the King's Head Theatre, May 18th 2019


It’s tough being young these days, and the dynamic writing-directing duo of Ivana Mazza-Coates and Madeleine Shenai are determined to prove it with their new work, Boomerang. So-called for the generation of unfortunate twentysomethings forced to turn around in the mid-flight of their fledgling lives and careers and beeline right back into an indefinite stay under their parents’ roofs, the result is a passionately realised and engaging evening of dramedy theatre firmly set in a noble Bernard Shavian tradition of socially conscious, didactic art, and a Bertolt Brecht-like insistence on the theatre as a forum for radical political ideas and discussion.

We follow Mauve (Megan Purvis) in her efforts to organise a dinner party with her old friend Holly (Alice Kerrigan). In the twilight of her twenties and still living with her mum, she struggles through working life desperately unfulfilled and already dreading an insignificant existence and oncoming elderly death. Meanwhile, her mother Mel (Nicola Wright) is beset with worry that her seemingly rudderless, idling daughter hasn’t grown up properly and begs her to do something meaningful with her life – circumstances surely too familiar to any millennial trying desperately to scrape together a respectable life in the midst of the economic desolation and social privations of austerity. Meanwhile, Holly has left things unsaid for years which threaten to implode her and Mauve’s friendship, and all this is before Mel’s recovering alcoholic, would-be new-age hippie boyfriend Len (Daniel Higley) has turned up to join them, in the throes of a pathetic mid-life crisis.

The play ruminates on all of the contemporary bugbears of “the Boomerang Generation”, amongst them a soul-crushing urge towards social presenteeism, the nagging, torturous sense that we’re too old to be where we still find ourselves in life, and all manner of spiritual desolation and existential pains, explored and examined in Mazza-Coates’ and Shenai’s bold, inventive, and quirky writing which is full of warmth, pithy humour and off-beat spirit. The strength and depth of their writing is a highlight, skilfully concealing a tangible darkness beneath the moments of humour and levity, suggesting a uniquely modern, suburban strain of Samuel Beckettian melancholy in a domestic landscape of shattered hopes and dreams, and evoking the tense, foreboding style of a Harold Pinter play in which everyone is at each other’s mercy and all pretence is doomed to crumble to dust, with a final Jim Cartwright-esque lightness of tone and keen sense of gallows humour just about managing to take the edge off of the undercurrent of oppressive misery.

The writing on show is ably assisted with strong performances from the entire cast. Nicola Wright is pleasingly cringe-inducing as Mel, making crass, embarrassing sex jokes and gauchely exposing her daughter’s private neurosis in front of her friend, every inch the pitiable forty-something still desperately wishing she was her daughter’s age, but one with a heart who genuinely cares for her child’s future. Daniel Higley’s Len is an energetic, entertaining highlight, making for a grimly funny, sad spectacle of decrepit middle-age clinging to wasted youth by his fingertips, brimful of vacuous, Instagram-ready new-age claptrap and painfully inadequate, pseudo-philosophical easy answers to deep-seated modern problems of the self.

Megan Purvis’ Mauve, meanwhile, is the millennial struggle incarnate. She masks spiritual desolation, dissatisfaction with her life, chronic loneliness, and her contentions with the myriad moral and ethical crises of her time with endearing warmth, peppiness, and clumsiness from her first moments on stage, creating a compelling and relatable character, and also proves herself capable of great range, delivering tender, observant monologues with great skill in a strong performance. Alice Kerrigan as Holly, meanwhile, immediately makes a fond impression, contrasting a lively, bubbly and sweet outward demeanour with a mousy and anxious bent which betrays suppressed depth of feeling. She shows a similarly great range, going from upbeat mousiness to shocking, erratic derangement, giving her role emotional intensity and impressively carrying off beautiful monologues on love.

Beyond the writing and performances, production designer Shanti Gordon’s picturesque, richly detailed set is a pretty sight to behold even before the show has begun, casting events against the background of a baby-blue sky and lending proceedings the feeling of a series of grimly contrasting, artful portraits of modern life, with her jaunty, youthful choice of background music setting a light, breezy tone against which to messily juxtapose and emphasise the heights of intense, beautifully performed human drama the work ascends to by its end.

All told, with its history of being first performed as scratch, and now as a stage play, Boomerang retains a distinctly experimental, nascent feeling throughout of being perhaps slightly underwritten and not yet as fully-formed as it could be with more development time; but even in its current form it nevertheless remains a beautifully staged, powerfully performed, thought-provoking, and compelling human drama capable of reaching great dramatic heights. Its run has ended, but in its wake it leaves behind an intriguing proof-of-concept and high hopes for what producer Paula McGann’s all-female company posse can achieve with their forthcoming television adaptation. I look forward to seeing it.

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Review: Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice (Ninja Theory, 2017) #WorldMentalHealthWeek


Ninja Theory’s Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice doesn’t lend itself to being described in terms of a typical game. On the contrary, one has to resist the urge in reviewing it to write hundreds of words about little more than the personal effect it has on its players, because it goes so far out of its way to avoid being anything like what we might think of as an ordinary modern gaming experience. In fact, it isn’t so much a game– and certainly not the high-octane hack-and-slash adventure that its initial public advertising pitch suggested - as it is an oftentimes relentlessly bleak, unnerving, and disturbing experience about serious mental illness, and what it means to go through Hell. In the course of the titular Celtic warrior Senua’s journey through the Viking underworld in search of her partner’s lost soul, so much is done to touch upon the uniquely personal causes of complex mental illness and the realities of living with it - isolation, ostracism, severe trauma, abuse, bereavement, abrupt and unpleasant ends to important relationships, none of which are usually the subjects of your typical video game plot - that a deeply personal, affecting experience emerges, which I’m loathe to go into too much revealing detail about for fear of spoiling it for others.

That being said, as a game, strictly speaking, Hellblade doesn’t feel any need to reinvent the wheel, and players won’t find anything spectacularly new in terms of its overall design or mechanics. Instead, in every aspect of its creative input, from art style and direction to sound, narrative, and level design, to gameplay mechanics, Hellblade is far more interested in being an interactive simulation of having a mental illness rather than being another action game. The experience is divided into puzzle solving and combat sections, the former consisting of searching for visions of Nordic runes to unlock the path forward, and dispelling illusions by finding the right vantage point to be able to see through them, in a clever meta-narrative representation of the experience of seeing things and patterns which aren’t actually there so common to the real-life sufferers of Senua’s psychosis.

Senua battles her demons. Credit: Ninja Theory

Meanwhile, fighting in Hellblade is a fairly accurate representation of actual mano-a-mano broadsword fighting – in other words, slow and heavy, encouraging careful manoeuvring in battles that can become extremely tense and stressful, numbering as many as 4 or 5 heavily armed and armoured foes against one (albeit one with several voices in her head helpfully spurring her on) in the later stages, as well as a few inventive boss battles along the way. So far as controlling all of this goes, there’s the standard division of combat into light, heavy, and melee attacks on a face button each, with blocking and timed parrying on the left bumper of a standard Xbox 360 PC controller, and although the controls are never anything less than responsive and satisfying to use, those seeking any mechanical depth and complexity or the stereotypical video game warrior power fantasy from Hellblade’s combat systems will be disappointed. Instead, Hellblade’s simulation de-emphasises confrontation, with combat sections few and far between in a thoughtful riposte to the wildly inaccurate, stereotypical association of mental illness with violence. Entire lengthy sequences see Senua totally unarmed and far more at risk of harm from others than likely to do harm to them, all whilst she nevertheless remains extremely ill, as is so often the case in reality.

At other times in the game, there’s little to occupy you except walking at a middling stride through the environment whilst a narrator recites Norse mythology to you, discovered by going off the beaten path to seek out the many hidden Lorestones in the levels, all whilst the voices continue to endlessly chatter and complain inside your head. This isn’t necessarily a negative either, with the game’s Unreal Engine 4 being put to great use in showing off vast, visually stunning mythic landscapes awash with gorgeous lighting and effects and full of attention to detail. Everything is beautifully, fluidly animated as well, with Senua’s movement consistently weighty and convincing, and combat animations are suitably forceful and impactful, making every armed encounter with the visually striking, nightmarish enemies intense, visceral, and satisfying.

The Unreal Engine's visuals draw surreal beauty out of the dark. Credit: Ninja Theory


In its art direction and audio-visual design, Hellblade is consistently a strikingly beautiful, thought-provoking experience that from its opening moments manages to be disarmingly impactful and compelling, so much that I became utterly absorbed in the story and within moments forgot that I was playing a game, not thinking to simply press Pause and bring up the convenient list of the controls when Hellblade steadfastly refused to garishly take up screen space with anything as typically game-ish as tutorial messages or a UI. Instead, I found myself feeling my way through the unknown without help, ignorant of what to do exactly, and desperately trying to make sense of it all, in much the same way I imagined Senua must have to. Ingeniously, the recordings for the ceaseless voices she hears in her head have been captured with a binaural microphone, so players that go along with the recommendation to use proper headphones can fully experience an unnervingly accurate simulation of the auditory hallucinations central to Senua’s mental health crisis. Altogether, as a carefully crafted, simulated experience of mental illness, Hellblade is a peerless triumph, so much so that the game took home not just one, but five BAFTAs earlier this year, with Ninja-Theory’s in-house-video-editor-turned-lead-actress Melina Juergens deservedly winning Best Performer over some very stiff professional competition for her extraordinary motion capture and voice work as Senua. She gives a powerful, evocative, and affecting performance here which is more than worth a playthrough just to witness by itself.

Hellblade does, though, have its flaws as a game. The endless searches to find runes in the environment can become tedious, design attempts to lessen this frustration notwithstanding, enemy types are lacking in variety and, depending on how good your sense of direction is, navigating the more labyrinthine environments and puzzles themselves might tend to get perplexing and slightly frustrating for some players. More than once, I found myself looking up a guide to clear these roadblocks and carry on with Hellblade’s gripping story, which the shallow surrounding gameplay systems can sometimes seem to be little more than a distraction from. Frankly, Hellblade isn’t even a particularly fun or entertaining game much of the time. Instead, it’s frequently harrowing and full of deeply disturbing sound and imagery unsuited to the faint of heart. Hellblade makes it abundantly clear before players have even made it to the main menu, though, that it is not meant as trifling entertainment, that its subject matter is not to be taken lightly, and that to go in expecting a typical action game is to miss the point of Hellblade’s intention to be an interactive experience of psychosis more than anything else.

All the signs of madness. Credit: Ninja Theory

Players willing to steel themselves and keep an open mind, though, will find that Hellblade is an outstanding storyteller, dazzling with an array of creative narrative tricks and design techniques to convey Senua’s warped reality to us – including one particularly clever instance that wonderfully captures the experience of obsessive-compulsive catastrophizing through visual design and co-opting the player’s own broader acquired knowledge of typical game mechanics. The uniquely interactive nature of gaming itself becomes very enlightening on the difficult topic in that Senua’s insanity ultimately doesn’t matter. If we, the player, want to get anywhere in letting her story be told, or helping her overcome the challenge in front of her, and ourselves, we have to start by fundamentally accepting that her perception of the world is as real and valid as ours, internalise it, co-operate with her, listen to the voices inside her head, and be open to seeing things and patterns that, as far as she’s concerned, are there, even if we know that they aren’t really. The suspension of disbelief which you need to participate in fiction in and of itself serves the narrative, and builds empathy with the strange lived experiences of the seriously mentally ill. In doing all of this, what Hellblade can be said to be, if it is anything, is proof of what games as a medium are capable of doing with a narrative, and that makes it tremendously, groundbreakingly important.

It’s also hugely significant that of the five (count ‘em, five!) BAFTA awards Hellblade won, one was in the category of Game Beyond Entertainment. Whereas before the inherent flaw of literature, theatre, or film was that we had inbuilt hard limits on our potential proximity to other lives and experiences, we now have powerful technology in games that allows us to be placed almost directly into the bodies and minds of fictional people, to see their world as they see it, hear their thoughts inside our own heads, and to walk for hours or days in their shoes. For years, all of these other mediums have been given permission to be more than just entertainment, and Hellblade stands out as by far one of the most convincing cases that the industry has ever presented that it is time, in our day and age, to finally grant the medium of games the same leave. Its uncompromising portrayal of serious mental illness is more authentic, compassionate and respectful to those that actually live with it than most films, which have had more than a century to improve and refine themselves, and yet too often continue to cynically, abusively, and dangerously exploit their portrayals of mentally ill human beings, making them into little more than cheaper substitutes for B-movie monsters.

Melina Juergens gives an outstanding motion-capture performance as the warrior Senua. Credit: Ninja Theory

Developer and publisher Ninja Theory, meanwhile, working within a far younger and less experienced medium, have done an excellent job doing their homework on mental illness and psychosis, bringing in a wide range of expertise from psychiatry professors at Oxford to professionals working within mental health services, and – most crucially – ordinary people from all walks of life with lived experience of the condition. Consequently, there’s a raw, visceral quality to everything Senua goes through in her illness because no aspect of it has been made up, and her story has an unusual, affecting power in knowing that somewhere in the world is a real person that has experienced at least some part of what she does. It’s to the credit of all the staff on the game that the writing and handling of these representations has been treated with such care and consideration at every step of the creative process that exposure to it – as much as it often distresses and disconcerts – never inspires pity, only empathy and an increased understanding of what it is like to live with such a serious illness, and it is because of – not in spite of – the uniquely interactive element of gaming’s form and function that this effect is achieved. In being compelled to directly, personally interact with Senua and her experience of her illness, we can’t fully separate it from ourselves, or other her as being unlike us, as we could so easily with films, a stage play, or a book. Her experiences must, on some fundamental level, become our own if we want to meaningfully engage with the game. To create that kind of kinship with the experience of another recognisably human being should surely be the highest aspiration and greatest accomplishment of any form of art.

To that end, Hellblade is a superb demonstration that the potential of games for storytelling, education, and consciousness-raising is limitless in a way no other art form has had liberty to be in our history, and whilst it may not be a perfect game by any means, it deserves to be remembered as a sincere and accomplished effort to advance the intellectual and emotional breadth, depth, and capacity of the entire medium. Indeed, perhaps the best understanding of the experience of living with precarious mental health for newcomers to the topic can be gained simply by playing Hellblade again a second time. It’s not any less scary, but you can plan for what’s coming now. The voices don’t go away. They never go away, but you can learn to accept them being there, and to listen when they help, and shut them out when they don’t. Eventually, you can figure out how to cope, and to learn to live with the reality of it.

That means a lot.